How to pass parameters using ui-sref in ui-router to the controller -- [Question Asked]

Query asked by user

I need to pass and receive two parameters to the state I want to transit to using ui-sref of ui-router.

Something like using the link below for transitioning the state to home with foo and bar parameters:

<a ui-sref="home({foo: 'fooVal', bar: 'barVal'})">Go to home state with foo and bar parameters </a>

Receiving foo and bar values in a controller:

app.controller('SomeController', function($scope, $stateParam) {
  //..
  var foo = $stateParam.foo; //getting fooVal
  var bar = $stateParam.bar; //getting barVal
  //..
});     

I get undefined for $stateParam in the controller.

Could somebody help me understand how to get it done?

Edit:

.state('home', {
  url: '/',
  views: {
    '': {
      templateUrl: 'home.html',
      controller: 'MainRootCtrl'

    },

    '[email protected]': {
      templateUrl: 'a.html',
      controller: 'MainCtrl'
    },

    '[email protected]': {
      templateUrl: 'b.html',
      controller: 'SomeController'
    }
  }

});

Answer we found from sources

I’ve created an example to show how to. Updated state definition would be:

  $stateProvider
    .state('home', {
      url: '/:foo?bar',
      views: {
        '': {
          templateUrl: 'tpl.home.html',
          controller: 'MainRootCtrl'

        },
        ...
      }

And this would be the controller:

.controller('MainRootCtrl', function($scope, $state, $stateParams) {
    //..
    var foo = $stateParams.foo; //getting fooVal
    var bar = $stateParams.bar; //getting barVal
    //..
    $scope.state = $state.current
    $scope.params = $stateParams; 
})

What we can see is that the state home now has url defined as:

url: '/:foo?bar',

which means, that the params in url are expected as

/fooVal?bar=barValue

These two links will correctly pass arguments into the controller:

<a ui-sref="home({foo: 'fooVal1', bar: 'barVal1'})">
<a ui-sref="home({foo: 'fooVal2', bar: 'barVal2'})">

Also, the controller does consume $stateParams instead of $stateParam.

Link to doc:

You can check it here

params : {}

There is also new, more granular setting params : {}. As we’ve already seen, we can declare parameters as part of url. But with params : {} configuration ‚Äì we can extend this definition or even introduce paramters which are not part of the url:

.state('other', {
    url: '/other/:foo?bar',
    params: { 
        // here we define default value for foo
        // we also set squash to false, to force injecting
        // even the default value into url
        foo: {
          value: 'defaultValue',
          squash: false,
        },
        // this parameter is now array
        // we can pass more items, and expect them as []
        bar : { 
          array : true,
        },
        // this param is not part of url
        // it could be passed with $state.go or ui-sref 
        hiddenParam: 'YES',
      },
    ...

Settings available for params are described in the documentation of the $stateProvider

Below is just an extract

  • value ‚Äì {object|function=}: specifies the default value for this parameter. This implicitly sets this parameter as optional‚Ķ
  • array ‚Äì {boolean=}: (default: false) If true, the param value will be treated as an array of values.
  • squash ‚Äì {bool|string=}: squash configures how a default parameter value is represented in the URL when the current parameter value is the same as the default value.

We can call these params this way:

// hidden param cannot be passed via url
<a href="#/other/fooVal?bar=1&amp;bar=2">
// default foo is skipped
<a ui-sref="other({bar: [4,5]})">

Check it in action here

Answered By – Radim Köhler

This Answer collected from stackoverflow, is licensed under cc by-sa 2.5 , cc by-sa 3.0 and cc by-sa 4.0


What is Angular?

Angular is an open-source, JavaScript outline written in TypeScript. Google keeps up with it, and its basic role is to foster single-page activities. As an edge, Angular enjoys clear benefits while likewise outfitting a standard design for formulators to work with. It empowers stoners to deliver huge tasks in a viable way. textures overall lift web improvement viability and execution by outfitting an agreeable construction so that formulators do n't need to continue to modify regulation from scratch. textures are efficient devices that offer formulators a large group of extra elements that can be added to programming easily.

However, is JavaScript ideal for creating single-sprinter activities that bear particularity, testability, and trend-setter efficiency? maybe not.

JavaScript is the most by and large utilized client-side prearranging language. It's composed into HTML reports to empower relations with web sprinters in endless extraordinary ways. As a genuinely simple to-learn language with inescapable help, creating current operations is appropriate.

Nowadays, we have various textures and libraries intended to give essential outcomes. As for front end web advancement, Angular addresses incalculable, while possibly not all, of the issues formulators face while utilizing JavaScript all alone.
Who we are?

We are team of software engineers in multiple domains like Programming and coding, Fundamentals of computer science, Design and architecture, Algorithms and data structures, Information analysis, Debugging software and Testing software. We are working on Systems developer and application developer. We are curious, methodical, rational, analytical, and logical. Some of us are also conventional, meaning we're conscientious and conservative.

Answer collected from stackoverflow and other sources, is licensed under cc by-sa 2.5 , cc by-sa 3.0 and cc by-sa 4.0